Paradoxes of Accepting & Striving
An interesting finding in the Tree is the emergence of a contrast between acceptance of situations and determining possibilities.
The odd levels seem to suggest acceptance of imperfections in the status quo; while even levels suggest investigating and enabling improvements. This is a manifestation of an oscillating duality, found in all THEE 7-level hierarchies.
See a Table
|
Pluralist-III
[L-I] |
SPIRAL ONLY: Participative devolved politics |
Determine community strengths and enable political change |
7 |
Communalist
[L-V] |
Human needs, that are intrinsically personal and communal. |
Accept differences amongst communities and tolerate inequalities amongst individuals.
|
6 |
Transcendentalist
[L-VII] |
Personal principles and cultural identity. |
Determine inner convictions and enable integrity. |
5 |
Conventionalist
[L-II] |
Public opinion, social sentiment and the practical adaptations of individuals. |
Accept public sentiment and tolerate conventions, herding and common practical choices. |
4 |
Rationalist
[L-1] |
Government seeking solutions to problems in a rational consultative way. |
Determine the nature of problems and select a socially acceptable resolution. |
3 |
Individualist
[L-IV] |
Individuals’ own interests, social obligations and responsibilities |
Accept differences amongst individuals related to growing inequalities in wealth. |
2 |
Legitimist
[L-VI] |
Rule of law and equality under the law. |
Determine the extent of enfranchisement and organize the redistribution of powers and wealth. |
1 |
Pluralist-1
[L-III] |
Differential benefits & power struggles to sustain these. |
Accept existing elite classes & tolerate inequalities in power and privilege. |
The Table can also be represented as interlinked diamonds in the TET-Spiral diagram as shown below.
Originally posted: July 2009; Last updated: 27 Jan 2010